tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7584319303804919668.post7869168867558775860..comments2024-03-12T14:26:50.537+05:30Comments on Simplicity @ the other side of Complexity: In search of a 'sharp' employee value propositionPrasad Kurianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00392000963081576320noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7584319303804919668.post-27133953243323283082008-10-24T18:04:00.000+05:302008-10-24T18:04:00.000+05:30Thanks for the comment.My point is that to be able...Thanks for the comment.<BR/><BR/>My point is that to be able to make EVP work (i.e. to deliver it within the organizational constraints), often organizations have to make the EVP sharp/focused. What we are more bothered about here is the substance of the EVP and its effective delivery – not the wording of the EVP per se (though the wording is important from a communication point of view – the organization should deliver value and also be perceived to be delivering value). <BR/><BR/>Of course, if you are in an organization whose EVP is well known & well understood/accepted, then you don't have to publicize it further. However, many organizations might not be in such an advantageous position. Please note that most of the attrition in the high-tech industry tends to be intra-industry attrition. So while the industry level EVP is well understood/accepted (and hence there is not much risk of losing people to other industries), particular firms in the (high-tech) industry can lose a lot of people to other firms within the (high-tech) industry. So from the point of view of a particular organization in the high-tech industry, there is still the need to have/deliver a differentiated and focused employee value proposition.Prasad Kurianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00392000963081576320noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7584319303804919668.post-33182167441075805892008-10-24T15:56:00.000+05:302008-10-24T15:56:00.000+05:30IMHO if a firm is spending time on sharpening an E...IMHO if a firm is spending time on sharpening an EVP statement, its spending effort in the wrong direction. this time should be better spent instead in ensuring that the EVP is actually working on ground in the orgn. <BR/>For ex, if an org in the Hi tech industry is known as a fertile ground for the cutting edge tech projects it works on, it doesnt overtly need to advertise that in a statement of purpose. SAS for ex doesnt need to articulate its EVP. its well known anyways.<BR/>anishAnishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09408455646052223544noreply@blogger.com